Thesis Abstract and Dissertation Abstracts
Neuroeconomic Appeal - "in This Case"
Abstract Category: Laws
Course / Degree: Neuroeconomic Law
Institution / University: Fine Fitness Foundation/UCLA, United States
Published in: 2013
The 1. [key] > knowledge empowers you in all oral arguments. The primary premise
of this thesis is - that the 2. [abc'] > (a)ttitude + (b)rief + (c)onversation you have with "the court"
creates an evironment of respect, and therefore creates a platform of performance,
and - with its structure comes 3. [light] > logically illuminating good highlighted themes
positioned to produce substance.
At it's 4. [core] > cognitive order respecting everything
linked to the 5. [court] > centrally ordering uniformed relevant themes.
Thus - it is essential to maintain respect from 'the court' which through process
subconciously enhances 6. [focus] > forming optimum concentration unleashing success.
This order provides 7. [beat] > best evidence signaling theme in the court
through conversation from counsel.
Furthermore - the fundamentals increases '(a)wareness + (b)alance + (c)onditioning'
makes it possible to 8. [(a)ct] > activate critical thinking 9. [(b)e] > breathe effectively
10. [(c)are] > create a rewarding environment
to perform at an elevated level.
This platform in itself reflects important
11. [steps] > showing thematic evidence powering structure
specifically in the oral argument.
The fundamental 12. [link] >logically illuminating natural knowledge
between the
13. [mind] > master internal navigating device
and - the
14. [brain] > brilliant resource absorbing information neurologically.
Best conversation and courtesy is the understanding of power
that oral argument will require
. Given the fact - it is the power which fuels the energy,
that gives rise to higher communications
in the court.
The thesis looks at 15. [law] > logic and words
and its 16. [load] > or in other words
'logical oral argument drawn'
to provide a clear and compelling case
for affirmation or reversal.
The author makes the 17. [case] > critical analysis seeks evidence
for the 18. [rule] > requiring unique legal examination to reach the
(a)ppeciation, (b)alance & (c)onclusion.
Ronnie C. Wright is the world's first Acroneticist,
inventor of Acronetics and Neuroacronetics,
expert in Neuroeconomics.
He is Official Registered with the State Of California Bar,
Office Of Admissions.
Thesis Keywords/Search Tags:
Neuroeconomics, Law, Appeal, In This Case, Ronnie C. Wright
This Thesis Abstract may be cited as follows:
No user preference. Please use the standard reference methodology.
Submission Details: Thesis Abstract submitted by RonnieC Wright from United States on 19-Jan-2013 01:06.
Abstract has been viewed 3299 times (since 7 Mar 2010).
RonnieC Wright Contact Details: Email: president@stayfine.org
Disclaimer
Great care has been taken to ensure that this information is correct, however ThesisAbstracts.com cannot accept responsibility for the contents of this Thesis abstract titled "Neuroeconomic Appeal - "in This Case"". This abstract has been submitted by RonnieC Wright on 19-Jan-2013 01:06. You may report a problem using the contact form.
© Copyright 2003 - 2025 of ThesisAbstracts.com and respective owners.